Posts Tagged ‘Venture Capital’
Saturday, December 26, 2009 | Written by Erik Rostad
Posted under: Venture Capital |
Tags: ipo's, m&a, vc trends, Venture Capital |
No Comments
The Wall Street Journal recently reported on Venture Capital (VC) trends for 2009 compared to the last few years. As expected, numbers are down quite a bit this year but VC trends for 2010 are looking strong.
Here is a breakdown in the numbers reported by the WSJ & VentureSource:
Venture Capital Investments 2009 through 3rd Quarter:
- 2009 – $14.6 billion (down 41%)
- 2008 – $25 billion (down 19%)
- 2007 – $31 billion
Funds raised through IPOs by companies backed by Venture Capital:
- 2009 – $683.4 million (up 24%)
- 2008 – $550.6 million (down 92%)
- 2007 – $6.8 billion
Funds raised through Mergers & Acquisitions by companies backed by Venture Capital:
- 2009 – $9.1 billion (down 56%)
- 2008 – $20.5 billion
The Wall Street Journal predicted these sectors to expected growth and opportunity for Venture Capital in 2010 – social networking technology, mobile technologies, health care technology, and clean technology.
Tags: ipo's, m&a, vc trends, Venture Capital | Posted under Venture Capital | No Comments
Tuesday, December 15, 2009 | Written by Jim Beach
Posted under: Angels, Business Ownership, Venture Capital |
Tags: agents and brokers, angel investing, fund raising, Venture Capital |
No Comments
I had breakfast this morning with a consultant who is trying to raise money for a software technology company. The company has developed a cool technology for web sites. It actually might work for a certain sector of the web. The founders and owners of the company have , supposedly, run companies in this space before and have quite a few industry contacts.
But they hired my friend to raise some angel or VC money for them. My friend asked what percent is normal for agents that bring in funds. I told him 2% to 7%. And I started to question him about the firm, its technology, and its plans. He knew some of the answers, but his answers to many questions just demonstrated his lack of knowledge of the company and raised new questions. It was clear he barely knows the firm.
This brings several issues to mind. Why, if the founders have industry knowledge and connections, are is the company outsourcing this incredible important function? It seems to me that if the founders had such good connections, they would be able to raise the money themselves. In many ways, it raises more questions about the company. Do the founders really have such good contacts?
Also, the agent they have hired, my friend, needs to go one way or the other. He needs to just make introductions or he needs to learn everything about the firm. Being in the middle, is the worst place to be. If he represents himself as a representative of the company, only bad things can come of it. He will not be able to answer the questions well, and will hurt the prospects of the firm and will hurt his reputation with the investors.
Raise your own money! The investors are looking at the management team to judge how the firm will do. By hiring outsiders, the management team is announcing their weakness.
Tags: agents and brokers, angel investing, fund raising, Venture Capital | Posted under Angels, Business Ownership, Venture Capital | No Comments
Monday, October 19, 2009 | Written by Jim Beach
Posted under: Venture Capital |
Tags: georgia, tax incentives, Venture Capital |
No Comments
An article in the Atlanta Journal Constitution over the weekend revealed that Georgia is the only state in the union that does NOT offer tax incentives for money invested in venture capital. We must change this to grow the funds for entrepreneurs.
Tags: georgia, tax incentives, Venture Capital | Posted under Venture Capital | No Comments
Monday, October 12, 2009 | Written by Erik Rostad
Posted under: Angels, Raising Money, Venture Capital |
Tags: angel investors, kickstarter, musicians raising funds, Venture Capital |
No Comments
Entrepreneurs usually seek investments from three groups of people:
- Friends & Family (or FFF – Friends, Family, & Fools)
- Angel Investors – High Worth Individuals Investing their Own Funds
- Venture Capital Firms – Groups investing outside capital in large amounts
Friends & Family have always been the starting point, and are usually good anywhere from a few bucks to some tens of thousands of dollars. The Venture Capital funds are usually reserved for the likes of small companies seeking large investments to go to the next level and are usually in the ballpark of over $1 million. But a group exists in the middle for those seeking investments larger than what Friends & Family can offer, but under what a VC firm would raise.
This middle group is usually referred to as Angel Investors, and they are generally high-worth individuals seeking a bit of action with their money. They either take a small % of the company in exchange for the funds, or just invest out of a sense of adventure with no expected return.
The great thing about the Internet is that it has connected entrepreneurs to Small Angel Investors in a way that was not possible before. I say Small Angel Investors because one does not need to have a high net worth and can invest as little as $5 over the Internet. Take the site Kiva, which connects blossoming entrepreneurs from around the globe to those with extra capital. The returns are not guaranteed, nor are they percentages that VC’s like to see, but if the entrepreneur makes a return on the investment, so will you as the donor.
Also, look at an industry in the midst of dramatic changes – the music industry. In the past, a musician with a small following could approach a record label, and in exchange for their soul, could receive money to record an album, buy equipment, or tour the USA. Now that funds are all but frozen at record labels, they can no longer act as Angel Investors to promising musicians (if you look nowadays, record labels usually only pick artists who are entrepreneurs and have created an album, tour, and following all by themselves).
That role has now gone to sites such as KickStarter. Kickstarter is the self-proclaimed “funding platform for artists, designers, filmmakers, musicians, journalists, inventors, explorers…” My buddy and bandmate, Tyler Herrin, is currently using this platform to raise funds for his current album. Through Kickstarter, Tyler can raise the necessary funds for his album. And in exchange for these funds, Tyler does not have to give away the rights to his songs or a % of his earnings. What he does is offer exclusive gifts and shows for the biggest backers.
This is really a brilliant way for entrepreneurs with an artistic bent to raise funds. Kickstarter profiles are easily shared on social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace.
So, whether you are an entrepreneur in Africa, a musician in Atlanta, or a small business owner in Timbuktu, there are many options available for you in which to raise funds for your endeavor. This is really where social networking can play a big part for your business/band/etc. If you have created fans of your idea/art/proposal and have kept people “in the know,” they will be more likely to financially back your endeavor when capital is required.
Tags: angel investors, kickstarter, musicians raising funds, Venture Capital | Posted under Angels, Raising Money, Venture Capital | No Comments
Monday, August 31, 2009 | Written by Jim Beach
Posted under: Angels, General Thoughts, Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
2 Comments
Welcome to another Shark Tank recap! These week’s show had some big winners and some big losers…… And we saw Barbara Corcoran’s soft side. Final count of “You are dead to me!” outbursts this episode, 4 – and 1 “then I kill you!”
The first contestant was immigrant from Ghana, Kwame Kuadey who started Gift Card Rescue. He is a great example of low risk entrepreneurship and how starting a business can help you escape the uncertainty of the job marketplace. He started this business while working for the man, but was fired recently. He buys unwanted gift cards and then sells them at a discount. He knew his numbers, was well prepared, and was very articulate. His request for funding was very reasonable. Three sharks were out quickly, saying the business was not right for them. Kevin, the bald guy, offers $150k for 50%, unusual that he is willing to be equal partners. Robert ups the offer to $200k for 50%, a really good offer. Kwame accepts, a really good deal for him. This is one of the very, very rare times when the entrepreneur is treated fairly and everyone wins. Why did it happen this way? Because he is very prepared, very effective, and had a great, solid idea.
Next is Gina Cotroneo who sells generic products with happy messages on them. She hugs each product, draws a smiley face on each package, and clearly is trying to spread good vibes with her company, Soul’s Calling. Her goal, to achieve “world happiness domination.” After several years, she only has $18k in sales. She has some cute products, but as the sharks point out, the marketplace is clearly not buying. They tell her to shut it down. Clearly, something is wrong with her company, probably her, but I disagree with the sharks, I think there is a market for these goods, but Gina needs to get out of the way and let someone else run the business for her. She asks for $600k, a ridiculous amount. Kevin tells her the business is really worth zero and tells her to quit! Robert tells her something very interesting, “the business is telling you something.” A powerful line. Businesses do tell us things, as does the marketplace.
Third is Dan Claffy who sells coffee branded items. Stupid idea. Who wants a bear what says “coffee” on it? He does have a trademark that protects him from anyone else doing this, but who cares? Someone else will want a java bear? Also, Dan tells the sharks he has tons of “commitments” for sales, for which they rightful pillar him. Don’t get commitments, get sales!! At The Entrepreneur School, we stress selling as the FIRST activity of a new business. Dan failed to do this, and he walks home empty-handed.
The next opportunity is a graffiti removal business owned by Paul Watts. Paul hopes to raise capital to franchise his business, cleaning graffiti off public spaces. He does not know how he will get communities to pay him for graffiti removal and, even more importantly, he does not known the product that removes the graffiti! He buys the chemicals off the shelf, just like anyone else can. Also, he asks for a $2 million valuation, with zero franchise sales so far! He is crazy. Horrible idea, horrible presentation. Kevin and Robert throw him a bone and offer $375 for 75% of the business. I have no idea why. There is no profit stream, so what are they seeing? Paul should take this gift and run happily. But he declines and he “is dead to me!”
Finally, Amy and Allison want $350k for 15% for a company that offers a protective slipcover for baby pack-and-play play-yards. Great idea. Being a parent, I love the idea. The two ladies try to sell the business without selling the patent, get caught, and it almost kills the deal. They have $250k sales in Target and sales to many hotel chains. Barbara offers $350k for 40%, a great deal for the ladies. Rightfully, they take the deal, a win-win for everyone.
Two successful entrepreneurs, both with good solid products, pre-existing sales, and good presentations. And some bozos……
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | Posted under Angels, General Thoughts, Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | 2 Comments
Monday, August 24, 2009 | Written by Jim Beach
Posted under: General Thoughts, Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
2 Comments
Just finished watching this week’s installment of “Shark Tank,” and again, it should be required viewing for all entrepreneurs or people that want to escape their financial uncertainty by learning how to start a business. First thought, I do see how the VCs could at first come across as nice, but they are rude, arrogant, and mean. They claim to like some of the contestants and then screw them or talk behind their backs.
The first contestant, Marian, invented a product called the TurboBaster, an improved turkey baster that does some other functions too. Maybe, she hasn’t produced one yet, not even a prototype. She wanted $35k for 30%, valuing her non-existent company and product at around $1 million. She doesn’t know anything, does not know the market size, cost of production. In the real world, she would be tossed out of a VC office in less than a minute. In fact, she would never get an appointment. But, they say they love her, love her “brand,” and therefore one of the VCs, the TV infomercial guy (Kevin), offers her a royalty of 2% for 100% ownership. The Fubu jeans VC offers some cash too and the 2% royalty. The Fubu guy has no experience in this type of market, while Kevin has sold hundreds of millions of kitchen products. She accepted the deal from the infomercial VC (Kevin), making her the luckiest entrepreneur alive!
The next entrepreneur, Bryan from Oregon, recycles used chopsticks and makes lamps, baskets, bowls, and other household items. Neat idea, kind of gross though. He already has about $500k in sales (over 5 years) and asks for $100k for 10% ownership. His profit margin is very low and he has already invested $100k, making him a pretty good bootstrapper (most of the money came from Visa and AmEx). But, his fatal flaw is his valuation. A million dollars for chopstick stuff? I love the business as a mom and pop, but I agree with the VCs, that this business does not deserve funding.
Third, Lori from Georgia sells stress-relieving books that help kids go to sleep. I have kids, and I have heard it can be difficult to get kids in bed. My kids get in bed when told and fall asleep, something they were taught using a system sort of like Lori’s. As a parent, I think her system is crazy. I strongly believe bad parenting is the reason for kids not going to bed easily. As an entrepreneur, I am impressed that she has done so well, already over 50k in profit. I would never invest in this and think it is crazy. The VCs point out she is already on Amazon and in Barnes and Nobles and Borders, and should be doing better! The bald VC offers her $250k for 100% of the company, reinforcing my belief that he is just a jerk. Two other VCs offer 250k for 51% and 50%. She is so bold to say “no,” and counters for with a 40% offer. Unbelievable. She should take whatever anyone offers for this silliness.
Ken was next. I cannot believe they allowed this guy on TV. He was hoping to sell a deck of flash cards that help kids learn the state capitols and values his firm at over $1 million. Could they not find another entrepreneur to highlight? Did they want some comic relief? Dumbest thing I have ever seen.
Jeff and his guitar company then asked for $500k for 5% of his firm! For a patented guitar that folds in half. Pretty cool idea, but so incredibly overvalued! The VCs offer a great, great deal and he turns it down! But even more incredibly, the bald VC says, “You are dead to me” when Jeff is trying to be nice. What a jerk. In this case, the VCs did offer a good deal and the entrepreneur was too cocky to say yes. After Jeff left, the VCs talk behind his back, saying some very rude things, and showing their true vulture personalities.
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | Posted under General Thoughts, Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | 2 Comments
Sunday, August 16, 2009 | Written by Jim Beach
Posted under: Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital |
No Comments
I hope you have seen the new TV show, the Shark Tank. Anyone seeking VC funding should watch this show to learn what egos these VCs have. They are all trying to out-asshole Simon from American Idol. There is one bald VC guy that is the biggest jerk I have never seen. There was one entrepreneur, a guy selling a device that prevents a car from starting if the seatbelts aren’t worn, and loved the idea. It is a winner, of course. The VCs were their jerky selves. The poor guy with the car device was eaten by sharks, asking for 500k for 10%. The bald guy offered 500k for 100%. Another guy, a slick guy, offered 1 million for 100%. The entrepreneur said NO and walked away!!! He loves his product and will fight for it!!! This show is very interesting stuff for the entrepreneurs….. I love the entrepreneur!!!
Tags: Raising Money, Reality TV, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | Posted under Raising Money, Shark Tank, Venture Capital | No Comments
Friday, July 24, 2009 | Written by Erik Rostad
Posted under: Venture Capital |
Tags: Bootstrapping, entrepreneurship, start-up funding, Venture Capital |
No Comments
We often hear conflicting stories about Venture Capitalist. First, we hear the success stories of funding that enabled Google, but we also hear horror stories of unmitigated evil perpetrated by Venture Capitalists.
As an entrepreneur, which side are you to believe? When should you use VC funding?
In today’s economy, entrepreneurs are trying to bootstrap their businesses as much as possible for a few reasons:
- To grow their business using cash flow as opposed to debt funding.
- To maintain full ownership of their company (funding collateral usually consists of a % of your company).
- To maintain control of the growth of their business.
But what happens when Venture Capital funding becomes necessary? What should you be looking for when seeking VC funds?
First of all, when researching Venture Capital firms, be aware that VC’s are not just about funding. Perhaps the more important issue is the experience the VC firm brings to your business. They are around businesses all day long. They have seen many failures, and a few home runs. They have their eyes on the market and can see how a new product could be better structured to meet the demands of the marketplace. Approach VC firms not just as financial partners, but as business partners.
Secondly, a VC firm can bring a certain clout to your business that is not present as a start-up. This clout can bring about instant recognition and credibility with both bankers and potential clients. VC firms have no choice but to brag about you to the market. It is in their best interest, and yours as well.
But be aware. Venture Capitalists must make a certain return within a tight time frame. To do this, they are likely to make drastic changes to your company (to the point of removing you as the entrepreneur). That is why careful consideration must go into seeking VC funding and limiting the % ownership (ie. level of control) you give to them. Before seeking VC funding, do all that you possibly can to bootstrap your business.
At the end of the day, you as an entrepreneur have a product or service to bring to the market. You want to be able to work with a VC firm that will help you bring the best possible product that will garner the most sales, making it a win-win for everyone involved.
Tags: Bootstrapping, entrepreneurship, start-up funding, Venture Capital | Posted under Venture Capital | No Comments
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 | Written by Erik Rostad
Posted under: Venture Capital |
Tags: 2Q investments, Bootstrapping, Venture Capital |
1 Comment
The Dow Jones VentureSource just released data regarding the amount of Venture Capital invested in the USA during the 2nd Quarter of 2009. The numbers are quite startling when compared to last year:
Venture Capital investments during 2Q 2009 were $5.27 billion (down 37% over same period last year).
Venture Capital investments during 2Q 2008 were $8.33 billion.
Venture Capital investments during 1Q 2009 were $3.99 billion.
The 1Q 2009 investment amount was the lowest since 1998.
What does this mean for entrepreneurs? Although VC funds have increased over last quarter, many entrepreneurs are concentrating on bootstrapping as many parts of their business as they can and only seeking VC funds for major purchases to bring their business to the next level.
Tags: 2Q investments, Bootstrapping, Venture Capital | Posted under Venture Capital | 1 Comment
Blog Menu
Change Your Life Now
Latest News
Professors Jim Beach & Chris Hanks are featured in Global Atlanta.
Click here to read the article.
- May 19, 2009
The Entrepreneur School blog reaches 300 posts!
- May 15, 2010
The Entrepreneur School blog visitors up 111% over last month!
- November 2, 2009
Tags
Categories
- Angels (11)
- Apple (6)
- Banking (6)
- Blog (13)
- Bootstrapping (25)
- Business Ownership (23)
- Business Partners (4)
- Business plans (2)
- Consulting (4)
- Creativity and Ideation (41)
- Economics (17)
- Energy and Oil (9)
- Entrepreneurship Quotes (19)
- Entrepreneurship Stories (43)
- Entrepreneurship Tools (11)
- Entreprneurship Training (3)
- Facebook (9)
- Financial Concerns (17)
- General Thoughts (132)
- Global Trade (2)
- google (16)
- Government (21)
- Health Insurance (7)
- Humor (2)
- International (29)
- Marketing (40)
- Podcasting (1)
- Raising Money (7)
- Ranking #1 on Google (10)
- Risk (3)
- Shark Tank (7)
- Social Media for Entrepreneurs (15)
- Technology (7)
- The Entrepreneur School (21)
- Tools (3)
- Total Entrepreneurial Activity (20)
- Uncategorized (11)
- Venture Capital (20)
- Website Design (11)
Monthly Archive
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (10)
- June 2010 (15)
- May 2010 (36)
- April 2010 (31)
- March 2010 (31)
- February 2010 (25)
- January 2010 (31)
- December 2009 (42)
- November 2009 (30)
- October 2009 (39)
- September 2009 (24)
- August 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (6)
- June 2009 (2)
Recent Comments